Sunday, February 11, 2018

Backing Up the Bitching

Seriously, I'm trying to write more.  I just have too many damn balls in the air.  Sorry this entry took a few weeks to see the light of day. The title is "Backing Up the Bitching", but I'm not sure how much "backing up" this will be--it's more of an attempt at conversation.

Facebook Thread

I've been pleased, and a little concerned, about the conversation my journal has initiated on FB. There's definitely a need for conversation, but open up the gateway, and a flood of bitching begins. That's the beauty and the beast of social media. We need to have a platform to express our frustrations, but we also need to step back and look at the bigger picture.  Since most of us breed in isolation, it's easy to become hyper-focused on our own issues. Some of them are universal, effecting all of us--some of them, however, are, indeed, individual. A horse did badly at a keuring. The jury didn't license your stallion prospect. You got taken advantage of by a KWPN stallion owner who was happy to sell shitty frozen semen to North America.  Oh, wait.  That's all of us!

Backing Up the Bitching

I am a supporter of the KWPN system, and, by proxy, the KWPN-NA system. There are problems in both systems--they're not all insurmountable, however. Let me throw out a few thoughts:

KWPN vs. KWPN-NA


In the bigger picture, we are both blessed to be held to the same standards and protocols of the KWPN, and cursed by it. What works in Holland doesn't necessarily work here. There has to be a balance of maintaining the standards and continuity of selection with the specific and particular needs of North America. It doesn't seem as if we have anyone currently in our corner on this. Yet, when people make broad statements about the KWPN never allowing the KWPN-NA to become competition, or they're protecting their frozen semen market, so that's why they don't approve stallions, I don't buy it.  Yes, I've seen some politics in play over the last 30 years, but I don't think that's the norm. I think the bigger issue is that North America remains a market to sell riding horses for big bucks, and the breeding stock and frozen semen market has been a disappointment overall. As a matter of fact, if we had a bigger market for breeding stock and frozen semen, I think the KWPN would be all over it, and we wouldn't be in the bind we're in.

Another bigger picture issue is that the KWPN-NA, whether due to its contractual or perceptual adherence to the KWPN philosophy, or due to its lack of awareness of the bigger picture in general, has tended to be an organization ruled by what we can't do, instead of an organization that looks at the possibilities and figures out how to get there. In any progressive business model, "Can't do it" and "No" are off the table in the brainstorming sessions. Nothing short circuits progress faster than a contingent of people who negate every idea because it's going to be too difficult, too expensive, or too risky.  The place for realists is in the implementation phase, not the vision phase.

Stallion Approvals

As far as stallion approvals and the scarcity of stallions available fresh cooled, there are a lot of factors in play here. Yes, we're in trouble.  As much as I have pontificated about the importance of marelines over the years, it's still the stallions that have the biggest impact on the breeding population. We definitely need more stallions and younger stallions in North America. That being said, standing a stallion in North America is a nightmare.  We don't have a big enough mare base to sell enough breedings year after year to offset the costs of buying, importing, marketing, and, if necessary, competing a stallion. Consequently, anyone who brings in a stallion is bringing him in either for their own breeding or sport purposes.  Also, North American mare owners are unrealistic in their expectations.  Every stallion needs to be the winner of his performance testing, have all first premium foals, be available for fresh cooled semen six days per week, and be out competing and winning with good video online to prove it. We're ridiculous. Yet, we'll spend thousands of dollars on frozen semen from a three year old stallion, with no offspring on the ground, whom we've never seen in the flesh, because he's black and we saw one fancy video on Facebook.  Crazy. Still, we need new, young stallions. I go to Holland at least twice a year, definitely once for the Stallion Show and once for the Horse Days. I have internalized what the modern KWPN dressage horse looks like. We have only one KWPN-approved stallion standing in North America who is producing anything close to what the modern Dutch dressage horse looks like. If it weren't for frozen semen, we would already be at least a full generation behind our Holland counterparts. There are some solutions to this. One, say a prayer, and hope ISF buys a new stallion.  Two, say another prayer and hope someone, anyone, buys a new stallion. Three, and the more practical, establish a KWPN-NA Stallion Selection Team that is not beholden to the KWPN Selection Committee. Right now, any stallion approval decision isn't based on North American need, it's based on significant input from the KWPN Stallion Selection Committee. Four, similar to what the regions of Holland and Germany did before the advent of transported semen, let the KWPN-NA function as stallion station for frozen semen. In the days of old, breeders of a region established niches based on the stallions available to them. This was a really good thing for the breeding populations.  Why not have the KWPN-NA buy 25 or 50 doses of a one or two stallions every year, then sell those doses to breeders at cost? We could have a team in place that determines the needs of the breeding population--the team negotiates the price of the doses--and, best yet, the team holds the sellers accountable for the quality of the product.  Years ago, the KWPN-NA sold Ferro, Ramiro, and others.  It was a great thing for the breeders, and it produced some really good horses.  There's no reason we can't do this again.

Register A

As far as Register A and its value to the studbook, I maintain it's a very good thing. There's a comment on the FB thread about its muddying the quality, or causing some interruption in the consistency of the KWPN standards, but I don't see it this way.  As I remember, when the Euro culture was created, all European studbooks were charged with finding a way to incorporate each other's breeding stock.  The KWPN is the only one that did. The other studbooks just accepted an inordinate number of foreign stallions with limited inspection and limited requirements. I see Register A as an improvement section of our studbook.  I also agree with the KWPN's loosening of the Register A requirements for entrance into the studbook. Granted, it may appear that I have an ulterior motive in saying this since we now own Gaudi, an AES-approved stallion whose offspring will all be Register A, but if you look at the requirements, he has fulfilled all but the performance--the new requirements for Register A horses to enter the studbook are for keur-eligible mares to undergo the performance requirement. The only thing that changes is that a mare can receive the ster predicate and still be Register A. This is a good thing. It brings more horses to keurings. It recognizes the positive influences through Register A.  Win win situation.


Growing Our Organization

I may be wrong about this, but I think our organization has had about 1400 members consistently for 20+ years.  It hasn't grown. Stating the obvious here, but any business needs to constantly vitalize its base and attempt to increase its market share to stay viable.  We haven't figured this out

The most profitable thing we do for our members is register foals.  That brings in a shitload of money...which ends up paying for a really expensive Annual Meeting, benefiting, on average, 50 to 100 people per year not on the BOD, Member's Committee, or some supporting committee. The Annual Meeting costs A LOT of money. I'm talking multiple tens of thousands of dollars. It is our biggest outreach and expenditure of the year, yet it benefits well less than 10% of our membership.  There's a problem here.

Don't get me wrong.  I have loved Annual Meetings.  Some of the best parties I've attended in my adult life were at Annual Meetings--and, there were some great personal connections, networking, and general information.  All this being said, overall, they are a waste of money. If the purpose of the Annual Meeting is for the different boards to get together in person, that can be accomplished more cheaply and more efficiently than by paying for expensive rooms in a top Florida hotel. If the goal is education of the membership, then that, too, can be accomplished more effectively by reaching out to multiple regions of the USA and Canada, and hosting a series of regional meetings, rather than one "resort" location that asks the attendees to shell out a significant amount of time and money. Again, I have wonderful memories from Annual Meetings, but, as a business owner and long-time member of the KWPN-NA, I'm offended by the amount of money spent on such a small percentage of the membership. The one benefit I see to the Annual Meetings is networking.  You do make connections with other breeders and enthusiasts.  Still, there are more effective, more efficient, and more cost-proportionate means of doing this, especially given the social media tools at our disposal.

Bitch, Bitch--Moan, Moan

So, that's my rant. It's easy to bitch when you're not involved anymore. By "not involved", I mean in the day-to-day workings of the organization--I'm certainly involved in breeding, stallion ownership, and the promotion of the KWPN horse. This is all about progress.  It's all about improving the breeding environment for Dutch horses in North America. 






Sunday, January 7, 2018

Gaudi


Gaudi




By now, I'm sure you've heard our big news:  We have purchased the AES approved, KWPN stallion, Gaudi (Totilas x DeNiro x Romancier x Troublemaker xx)! We are beyond excited both about Gaudi and the response the news of his coming to North America has generated. Not including our own girls, we've already booked almost 40 mares! So, a huge thank you for those of you who have already scored a date for your mare with Mr. Gaudi.

First and foremost, thank you to the Jansen family for agreeing to sell us this special stallion. We are thrilled that he will become a major influence on our breeding program, as well as the programs of many breeders in North America.

We're in the middle of a big website overhaul, so if you have questions about Gaudi or breeding to him, give me a shout.  Right now, the best place to find information is on his FB page, Gaudi at SSF. Our new site is gorgeous.  Tami Johnson from Masterworks has designed it. Scot's Journal is moving back to shootingstarfarm.com, so be on the look out in the next couple weeks.

In short, he is Totilas x DeNiro x Romancier. Anyone who has read my journal over the years know how I feel about Totilas. He will go down in history as one of the most influential sires in Dutch breeding. Then DeNiro. Hard to beat that combination. DeNiro continues to lead the World Breeding Rankings for Grand Prix dressage horses. Add the R line and a dose of TB, and you get an unbeatable pedigree.

More importantly, this mareline is amazing. Gaudi's dam, Annabel, is the leader of the KWPN index for dressage mares. She herself is elite, preferent, prestatie, and did a top performance evaluation. She's produced the approved stallions, Bretton Woods and Chagall D&R (both of whom are schooling Grand Prix)--plus is grandmother to the KWPN stallion, Four Legends. She's also produced multiple keur mares, NMK mares, and top, high-selling auction horses.

Gaudi himself made it through the first three steps of the KWPN approval process with much promise and praise, but was injured before he could attend the 70 Days Test. He was licensed AES, then received his full approval once the selection committee saw his offspring. Consequently, he's not approved KWPN, but he's approved AES, which is an erkend studbook.  This makes all of his offspring out of KWPN mares or other erkend studbooks eligible for Register A papers. Gaudi is PROK, so he has completed all the requirements of an approved stallion except for the performance test.  Due to breeder demand, the KWPN is in the process of adjusting the Register A requirements for entering the studbook--it now appears that only keur eligible mares will have to do the IBOP.

Gaudi brings the best pedigree possible, out of arguably the best contemporary KWPN mareline, and a super character and type, all wrapped up in a 16.2 hand, black-with-four-white-feet, supple, powerful dressage package.  On top of this, he's free of Jazz, Ferro, and Flemmingh, making him an important outcross for a huge percentage of the KWPN mare base.  He is a "dreams come true" horse for the Tolman family and the SSF breeding program. You can thank my wife that he's being made available to North American breeders--I wanted to keep him just for our program.

A Change in Focus


In keeping with the impetus for my recent journal entries, I'd like to share some of our thoughts, history, and long-range planning that have gone into this shift in the SSF breeding program. We have decided to build our program a bit, and, in doing so, try to fill a void that exists for KWPN dressage breeders in North America:  Affordable access to quality younger stallions.  Actually, we can't "fill the void," because we don't have the facility or financial means to bring in the number of stallions we need, but we can at least begin to do our part.

KWPN-NA dressage breeders have relied on the generosity, good will, and good selection of Iron Spring for a long time.  And thank god for them.  We would be in significantly worse shape without their stallion offerings--and I mean "we". Carol and I have bred to ISF stallions over 30 times. Their stallions have played a huge part in shaping our program. But, if we want to grow and meet the demands of the market, we need other people to come forward and take some of the risk, and the heat; we can't rely on one farm to suffer the responsibility of providing the bulk of the quality stallion selection for our mare base.

Of course, ISF is not the only farm that stands quality stallions, but of the 10 dressage-bred stallions activated with the KWPN-NA, only one of them is under 10 years old, and only two of them under 15. If no one were to import a new stallion in the next three to five years, we would be down to three or four stallions available with fresh cooled semen. And, given that we see on average one new stallion made available every two years or so, the numbers are looking grim. Plus, the core of the KWPN's breeding success has been early identification of top sires at a young age. Breeding programs make the fastest progress by breeding to the younger stallions. Of course, fastest and smartest progress are two different concepts, yet without our having access to younger stallions, we're not only NOT keeping up with the demands of our growing market, we're backsliding. Yes, the heart of a breeding program is the mares. I don't have access to the KWPN-NA data base to back this up, but from my observations, the number of quality mares is steadily increasing. Still, a national breeding program has to have quality sires available. We can rely on frozen semen for some of our options, but until a fair method of purchase is put in place and we have a more reliable product, it can be an expensive and frustrating option. When it works, it's great.  When it doesn't, it's easy to lose thousands of dollars per cycle. We need quality younger stallions available in North America.

We're starting with Gaudi. We have a DeNiro x Santano x Biotop stallion prospect in Holland who will begin the selection process next year. We kept two colts from our 2018 crop as stallion prospects--I'm pretty sure we'll send at least one of them to Holland. We will either keep or buy at least one stallion prospect each year for the next few years. These efforts are more self-serving and self-preserving than they are altruistic. We will breed a minimum of eight to ten mares again this year. For the past few years, I've bred almost exclusively with frozen semen. How much have I spent filling my tank with enough doses to breed eight to ten mares per year? How many of those doses might as well have been flushed down the toilet as put into a mare? How many of my mares decided they didn't want to be pregnant no matter how many doses of frozen semen with no LFG I put into them? It doesn't take long to get well into the tens of thousands of dollars and almost nothing to show for it.
We will breed two or three of our mares with frozen this year, but the bulk of the girls are having a date with Gaudi.

The title of my next entry was "Backing up the Bitching", but I think I'm going to hold off on that for just a bit. In the last couple days, we've had some inquiries about our 2018 and 2019 foals, so I need to do a journal entry that specifies our breeding and sales plans.

In closing, thanks again to the people who have already booked to Gaudi.  We appreciate your enthusiasm about him and your trust in us.

Thursday, January 4, 2018

A Call to Action


In North America, as I have certainly belabored in my previous post, we Dutch breeders are really on our own. Publications and show programs rarely list bloodlines, let alone the name of the breeder; we have no universally accepted national data base to track the success of our products in sport; the physical distance between us makes eyes-on self-education difficult; we have access to few quality stallions, and are subjected to the ridiculous arrangement of paying almost the full cost of breeding to a stallion in Europe for one dose of frozen semen with no guarantee; and the North American branch of our studbook is constantly stymied by a lack of vision and poor financial management. And I know I'm being repetitive and less than subtle here, we would be better off registering our horses directly through the KWPN and functioning as a breeding region rather than be a separate-but-not-separate organization. Breeders, and their needs, opinions, and decisions, in Holland drive the future of the KWPN. Breeders here drive nothing. We do not have a voice. In spite of the organizational systems and committees in place, our needs are not addressed except by proxy when the needs of the breeders in Holland coincide with our needs. Therefore, it falls to the individual breeding programs to set the standards. I'm too old, too opinionated, and too impatient to have our breeding program continue to be limited by other people's lack of vision.

In my reactions to warmblood breeding in North America (and in other things), I can be accused of many things:  blatant egotism, vociferousness, intolerance...and more.  Yet, anyone would be hard-pressed to question my passion for breeding or my decades-long support of hundreds of fellow breeders. I look out into the world of warmblood breeding in North America, and see a significantly more educated population of breeders with a significantly higher quality of breeding stock. If we can find some means of cohesion, our breeding programs are poised to rival those of Europe. We continue to suffer due to the limitations I mentioned in the previous paragraph, but, despite these inherent restrictions, the passions, research, hard work, and financial investments of North American breeders have substantially improved our situation--I'm just not sure we realize this yet. I'm not sure, as a whole, we recognize the potential that exists.

There are a number of viable paths moving forward.  Staying the course and allowing the effects of time and market to prevail will, most likely, be the option most people select, albeit by default. We have North American studbooks and organizations that will either self destruct or become obsolete, but the sport horse industry is only going to grow. Tell me Andreas Helgstrand doesn't recognize this. What about the now-annual VDL auctions? Yes, we have some significant shortcomings to overcome, especially in that all-important aspect of network of affordable, quality young horse trainers who can take the stock from North American breeders and get them to a place, training-wise, market-wise, and proximity-wise, that it becomes more viable for buyers to shop in here rather than in Europe. I'm not pollyanna about the significance of our lack of a training system and breeder-to-buyer network--it is a huge obstacle. But, I'm saying we have more pieces in place than we've ever had, and our market is becoming stronger and larger. We, as breeders, need to start making some more productive noise than bitching on Facebook. We need to sharpen the focus of our individual breeding programs, and, at the same time, come together, regardless of studbook affiliation, both to address the growing demands of our growing industry and to take advantage of the opportunities inherent in this growth.

For the Tolman family and Shooting Star Farm, this means we need to grow our program...and, there in lies the topic for my next journal entry!